U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon faced intense scrutiny from lawmakers on Wednesday as she defended the Trump administration’s proposed $12 billion cut to the Department of Education’s budget for fiscal year 2026. The hearing, held by the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies, highlighted the administration’s broader plan to significantly reduce the federal role in education.
McMahon argued that the 15% budget reduction is a strategic move to streamline the department and shift educational authority back to states and local governments. “We’ve spent over $3 trillion since the department was established, yet our scores continue to stagnate or fall,” she stated, emphasizing the need for a new approach to improve literacy rates and expand school choice.
The proposed budget cuts have sparked concern among Democrats and education advocates, particularly regarding their potential impact on federal student aid programs, including Pell Grants and work-study funding. Critics argue that reducing these programs could disproportionately affect low-income and minority students who rely on federal assistance to access higher education.
In response to questions about the feasibility of transferring the department’s responsibilities to state and local entities, McMahon maintained that decentralization would empower communities to tailor education to their specific needs. However, she provided limited details on how this transition would be managed or how it would ensure equitable access to quality education across different regions.
The hearing also addressed the administration’s plan to dismantle the Department of Education, a goal outlined in a March executive order signed by President Trump. While McMahon acknowledged that fully abolishing the department would require congressional approval, she indicated that the administration is taking steps to reduce its footprint, including significant staff reductions and reallocating certain functions to other federal agencies.
Despite the administration’s intentions, a federal judge recently blocked the plan to lay off over 1,300 department employees, ruling that such a move lacked proper legislative authorization and could effectively dismantle the department without congressional consent.
As the debate over the future of the Department of Education continues, stakeholders across the education sector remain divided. Advocates of the cuts argue that they will reduce federal overreach and promote innovation at the local level, while opponents warn that they could undermine critical support systems for students and educators nationwide.
The House Appropriations Committee is expected to further review the proposed budget in the coming weeks, with potential implications for the structure and role of federal involvement in education policy.
